For IndyCar, change is a good thing
IndyCar, IndyCar commentary — By Chad on January 24, 2013 2:41 pmSometimes we try things that we aren’t sure about. We dip only one foot in, just in case we need to get out quickly. We hesitate to try new things and worry about the repercussions if something doesn’t work out. Sometimes we hold back on making changes just because we aren’t sure how they will be received. We worry, almost to a fault.
To the contrary, INDYCAR has taken a no-worries approach to making changes for the 2013 season, and that is exactly the kind of approach needed to move forward.
The recent rule changes and new ideas that are being implemented for the upcoming season have already received mixed reviews. Beaux Barfield was on Trackside with Curt Cavin and Kevin Lee on Tuesday night, and he shared the feelings of the owners, drivers, teams, and how they all felt about the recent changes. He was quick to bring up that he did not want to mess with tradition but realizes that new ideas are good for the sport.
Barfield said, “I embrace the diversity that is INDYCAR racing, and it is important for me on one hand to embrace the heritage but also to look at new things that we can introduce to add intrigue and challenge the competitors.”
He went on to explain how the teams within INDYCAR were reacting to the changes. He said they tell him that they may not always agree with what he’s doing but they understand he’s making efforts to move INDYCAR forward.
This is the best possible reaction from everyone.
Sometimes we feel so strongly about something that we dismiss even the idea of listening to a different concept. The situation with the proposal of installing lights at the Speedway is a prime example. Yes, IMS has been around for over a century, and anytime someone wants to make a change to the historic race there is outcry. Many people believe lights will hurt the 500 because they will draw more attention to the NASCAR events than the Spectacle. However, the lights in theory could benefit INDYCAR by increasing revenue to IMS that can be used to fund the Series.
Standing starts, qualifying races, and double-header races are all things that have been done before, so why not embrace them? The fact is that we are going to have to wait and see how these things play out before we can accurately judge them. Some things don’t work out as planned, but others wind up going better than first imagined.
INDYCAR has also taken steps to eliminate fuel mileage racing by adjusting race distances at four events. How can anyone not be on board with that? Why does change always need to be seen as bad?
Barfield and his team have spent an incredible amount of time behind the scenes since the end of last season coming up with ways to improve and grow the sport. Everyone associated with INDYCAR needs to take a step back and recognize that those working on these changes are being proactive, which is something we all should appreciate and aspire to ourselves.
As the old saying goes, you’ll never know unless you try.
Tags: Beaux Barfield, Indianapolis Motor Speedway, Indy 500, Verizon IndyCar Series - Administration
Change is bad!
Nice take, Chad. Love the ideas they’re putting in for the most part. Making races unique in different ways gives the series character that no other American series really has, and each race becomes a new test that teams and drivers have to navigate. It’s entertaining, and lots of fans are looking forward to it.
I’ve been going to Indy for over 20 years. I love the place with all my heart. It had never occurred to me to put lights in until I read about that in Robin Miller’s mailbag a few months ago. My first thought was, “Why not?” And I still sort of feel that way. It won’t put any more emphasis on NASCAR events than is already there. I think that’s a stupid argument and I don’t really know where it comes from. Almost every non-race fan I speak to about going to the 500 says, “Oh, NASCAR, huh?” I have to explain virtually every time, that “NO, this is IndyCar.” “What’s the difference?” Sheesh. IndyCar already suffers from average sports fans knowing what it is anymore, and it requires grassroots hype from diehard fans in order to garner any attention at all. They have to figure out ways to make it more interesting so that we can sell it, too, even if just in casual conversation. Saying, “Oh it’s different from NASCAR because, well, because…umm…it’s just faster.”